"I have witnessed and experienced situations where people allow themselves to be overpowered by this side of them that they need to carefully re-nurture into something healthier. Perhaps the word 'nurture' is not the most appropriate word that must be used here. If i could re-rephrase the sentence, then it should be as follows: It certainly would be healthier if people could change their perceptual approaches, which would entail an overall smoother approach to life. Additionally, this could gradually enable people to realize that they have an innate goodness.
I firmly hold on to the belief that most people have constructed for themselves a personal web of meaning, and thus it would be logical to deduce that their approach towards other people are not completely dissociated with their personal webs of meaning they have constructed. That is, they would understand other people's experiences from the perspective of the subjective.
If our beliefs are not synchronous, then there is a great likelihood that it would create some sort of tension between individuals. It undoubtedly becomes quite easy or automatic in those kinds of situations to blame the 'opponent' and label him as being not understanding enough. Yet, I believe that if people could allow themselves to be lucid, then, they would perhaps realise that they can't blame anybody, because deep down they are aware of the underlying need for them to take into account the fact that the other person's beliefs was not congruent with his own beliefs. It would be a two-way circuit (even his belifs were not consistent with those of the other individual).
We can't teach people. Maybe people need to give themselves time to grasp the concept, assess it and accept it. I reckon that nobody would love to grow in an environment, devoid of empathy and understanding, but where heaviness, negativity and high emotions are massively dominant."
I firmly hold on to the belief that most people have constructed for themselves a personal web of meaning, and thus it would be logical to deduce that their approach towards other people are not completely dissociated with their personal webs of meaning they have constructed. That is, they would understand other people's experiences from the perspective of the subjective.
If our beliefs are not synchronous, then there is a great likelihood that it would create some sort of tension between individuals. It undoubtedly becomes quite easy or automatic in those kinds of situations to blame the 'opponent' and label him as being not understanding enough. Yet, I believe that if people could allow themselves to be lucid, then, they would perhaps realise that they can't blame anybody, because deep down they are aware of the underlying need for them to take into account the fact that the other person's beliefs was not congruent with his own beliefs. It would be a two-way circuit (even his belifs were not consistent with those of the other individual).
We can't teach people. Maybe people need to give themselves time to grasp the concept, assess it and accept it. I reckon that nobody would love to grow in an environment, devoid of empathy and understanding, but where heaviness, negativity and high emotions are massively dominant."